Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Podcasting - Assignment IV

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H27hllQRhp95Nf5ZXIN9OZbBbJAXSKHR6RT_2Q3djNo/edit?usp=sharing


Emerging technology can be described as innovative and progressive developments in a particular field.  Although podcasts are neither new nor cutting edge, the technology is finding its way more and more into library systems. The New Oxford Dictionary reports that the word podcast was chosen as their Word of the Year in 2005. The term is a combination of the word iPod and broadcast, although since its advent an iPod is not necessary to listen to a podcast (Sellers, 2007). This audio format links patrons to information (McDonald & Hawcroft, 2011) and appears more personal as it presents easily managed chunks of information in the recorders voice (Farkas, 2007). Simply put, a podcast is a digital audio file made available by uploading to a server and then accessed either by download, subscription, or through a direct link.  An audio file linked on a webpage is not a true podcast. Without the syndication, it would qualify as an audio file (Sellers, 2007). The portability of the file makes it ideal for library patrons on the go.  Libraries are faced with many challenges including how to best meet the needs of their patrons and many are finding that podcasts help the facility show relevance beyond the print book collection (McDonald & Hawcroft, 2011).  Peoples and Tilley (2011) define three types of podcasts: institutional, episodic, and audiobooks. This assignment will address the fundamentals of podcasting, the advantages in a library setting, possible disadvantages, and potential application for utilizing the technology in todays library and information centers.

            An institutional podcast would be unpublished scholarly work also referred to as a course-cast.  These audio files are especially useful for auditory learners in a university setting.  Examples include professor lectures, supplemental instruction, campus historical information, self guided tours, and campus news and events. Podcasts can clarify topics in a timely fashion and are flexible in their availability.  Accessibility is also quicker than traditional published literature.  Episodic podcasts are typically found on directories such as iTunes and could have irregular publication.  Science Friday (NPR) and The Journal Report (Wall Street Journal) are examples of episodic podcasts (Peoples & Tilley, 2011). The third type of podcast noted is the audiobook, typically commercially published. Creating a podcast is as easy as 1, 2, 3.  Infact, you only need three items – your information, a computer with a microphone, and open source software for recording. Depending on your setup, necessary equipment could change to a digital audio recorder, headphone with microphone or purchased software but for sake of this assignment the simple, budget friendly route will serve fine.  A manageable length of time for a podcast is recommended, which would vary depending on the information and target audience.  The subject matter should also be taken into consideration as some information would not translate well over audio alone. 

            Libraries are using podcasts to reach a wider audience including patrons who prefer an alternative to the traditional print resource.  The format lends itself to multi-taskers , auditory learners, and is a good fit for many visually impaired patrons. The content ranges from promotion of library services and programs to educate, news, history, storytime, tours, and information for those learning English (Peoples & Tilley, 2011; Stephens, 2007).  Sellers (2007) reports of law libraries utilizing podcasts to answer frequently asked questions (FAQ) such as landlord-tenant laws, elections, estate planning and disability laws.  Law personnel can also earn Continuing Education credits through podcasts.  A medical librarian in Warrensville Heights, Ohio reports that podcasts are used for patients to learn about surgical procedures prior to operations and that clinicians use podcasts to stay current in their field as the audio file can be accessible sooner than medical published literature (Peoples & Tilley, 2011).  Ultimately, the usage depends on the needs, preferences, available content and technical ability of the user (Farkas, 2007).

            Along with any progressive development there are disadvantages to consider.  The most noted being the time involved to create a podcast.  Personnel and allotting time for recording are the largest challenges (Stephens, 2007).  Then, a facility faces the logical questions of how to catalog and classify the resource, followed by questions over archiving and licensing as well as accessibility.  For many libraries the access is decided between location on the webpage or in the OPAC (Farkas, 2007; Peoples & Tilley, 2011). Depending on the stored location, bandwidth can play a factor in the speed of the download.  Even though podcasts provide an alternative format, the media is limited to the one recorded speed and not customizable – although there is an advantage of unlimited use and pausing at the user’s convenience.  If a facility is selecting previously recorded podcasts to download for patrons, there is a question of evaluating the content and determining the selection criteria (Peoples & Tilley, 2011). It is also difficult to determine the effectiveness of podcasts without statistics.  Finally, an audio file is not beneficial for all types of information.  If a patron wants to peruse the calendar of events, perhaps the best method of delivery is a webpage or print rather than an audio clip. 

            Research articles mention several potential applications for libraries to use podcasting in their collection.  Several systems have chosen to purchase devices and circulate them with preloaded audio content (McDonald & Hawcroft, 2011; Stephens, 2007).  This works well if a strategic plan is in place identifying the target audience and the content matches the audience.  Available podcasts should be dynamic or the podfade effect may take place, the issue of lack of new content  – no incentive to listen to the material and the service fades into the woodwork (Peoples & Tilley, 2011). Specialty libraries may find the technology especially useful as they can more easily identify needs as noted with the medical library patrons and clinicians. Currently, there are several free open source programs available to record podcasts.  These tools should be reviewed to determine their fit into the plan to integrate podcasts into any library collection.  Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/), creativecommons.org (http://creativecommons.org/podcasting), ipodder Lemon (http://ipodder.sourceforge.net/download/), and Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org/) are open source sites to help record or provide music for podcasts.  A few podcasts devoted to the profession are Adventures in Library Instruction, EDUCAUSE, The Library 2.0 Gang, T is for Training, Whatever Matters, Circulating Ideas, NCompass Live, This Week in Libraries, Games in Libraries and LibPunk (King, 2011).

Library personnel responsible for the podcasting must also be aware of the legalities of recording.  All necessary rights and permissions must be secured.  The Copyright Law does apply to creative and expressive work including performances, scripts, interviews, and musical and sound recordings.  Libraries must also comply with the TEACH Act and Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).  A library containing podcasts in its collection must include the offerings in a marketing campaign so that patrons are aware of the offerings.  Podcasts are one way for libraries to serve their patrons – another way to disseminate information in the evolution of libraries and information science.

References

Farkas, M. G.  (2007).  Social software in libraries:  Building collaboration, communication, and community online.  Medford, New Jersey:  Information Today, Inc.

King, D. L.  (2011, November 10).  Library podcasts you might find useful.  Retrieved from http://www.davidleeking.com/2011/11/10/library-podcasts-you-might-find-useful/

McDonald, D. & Hawcroft, R.  (2011, August).  Sound selection:  Podcasts prove positive.  The Australian Library Journal, 60(3), 231-236.

Peoples, B. & Tilley, C.  (2011).  Podcasts as an emerging information resource.  College & Undergraduate Libraries, 18, 44-57.  doi: 10.1080/10691316.2010.550529

Sellers, C. L.  (2007, May).  Are you podcasting? Current uses of podcasts in law libraries.  AALL Spectrum, 10-14.

Stephens, M.  (2007, February).  Technology connection:  All about podcasting.  Library Media Connection, 54-57.

I can see the light at the end of the tunnel...

This is day twenty of the 22 day zone...the whirlwind also called a Maymester.  And it has been a flurry of discussion posts, articles, assignments and then more discussions!  I have explored technology that I probably wouldn't have otherwise - Twitter and Joomla to be exact.  Might integrate Twitter into my school library but no plans for Joomla (other than singing "na na na na hey hey, goodbye!"

My classmates were very diverse in their technology levels, comfort levels and professions.  It was interesting to hear from others - everyone brought something to the table.

Best wishes to all on their future MLIS courses and in the pursuit of a position in information science/library, etc.

-Renee

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Last Day of School

Yesterday was a doozie.  Should have been an uneventful day of 2 finals and sending middle schoolers on their way home for summer. Instead, one of the 7th graders decided to snatch my iphone off of the desk and consider it hers.  When I realized it was gone (about 2 hours later) panic set in.  Not so much for the phone, internet connection, ability to text, etc.  But for the pictures stored in the phone.  I am not the best at downloading the pics in a timely fashion.  Lesson learned!

Of course, the school has video cameras everywhere and the library has two so we were able to track down the culprit after about 30 min of scanning videos.  This is not a high crime area and since I've been here (6 yrs.) I have never had a reason to feel like I needed to lock everything up, never turn my back, etc.

Sad way for a 14 yr. old to begin her summer - with paperwork for the juvie justice system. I hope that the experience scares her enough to never take something that doesn't belong to her.  Although, she never spoke to me, said she was sorry, shed a tear or even looked concerned.

I'll alter how I handle things in the library but it is a sad, eye opening experience for me.

Renee

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Assignment 3, Option 1 - Interview Transcript


MLIS 7505 – Assignment 3 Option #1     

Content Management System (CMS) Interview

Interviewed:  Mrs. Jeris Pflueger* (conducted via email)

Date:  Tuesday, May 21, 2013

1.       What type of library do you manage?

A public high school school library (9-12)  Gilmer High School*

 
2.       What was your decision making criteria for the CMS?

Predetermined by the Director of Technology (county level decision)

 
3.       What is the name of the CMS you are using?

Google Apps for Education (Gmail, Calendar, Google Docs, Google Drive, Google Sites, etc.)

 
4.       Have you used other Content Management Systems and if so, how does it rate in comparison to the current CMS?  Yes, I have used School Center which is more user-friendly than Google Sites.  The disadvantage of School Center was the cost.

 
5.       How many library personnel have rights to edit the site?

One, the school library media specialist.

 
6.       What is the goal for the CMS?  How do you foresee its use?

To be useful for all patrons (students, teachers, and parents); as a valuable resource for all whether it is used at school or at home (remote access).  Lessons are taught at school for students and teachers using this system to retrieve information.

 
7.       Did you receive training?  If so, how was the training delivered?

No, I did not receive training.  I used some online tutorials and figured out most of it on my own.

 
8.       Did you incorporate images? Sounds? Animation? Music? Text?

I incorporated images, animations and text.

 
9.       Does your CMS allow for a search feature?

No, it does not have a search feature.

 
10.   Does your CMS allow uploading of files (PDF, Word, etc.)?

It does allow for uploading of files.

 
11.   Does your CMS provide basic image editing tools (cropping, rotating, resizing, etc.)?

It does provide basic editing tools.

12.   Does your CMS allow for customization with the interface/homepage?

Yes, it does allow for limited customization with the homepage.

 
13.   Does your CMS allow an interactive feature (user feedback, blog, suggestions, contact information, collaboration, etc.)?  It does have a blog feature and contact information with the email link.
 

14.   Does your current CMS allow for versioning (being able to revert to a previous version or date)?

I am not aware of that feature in my current CMS.  The county technology department does have the ability to restore to previous saved dates.

 
15.   Are there features/functionality missing from your current CMS? 

The search feature.

 
16.   Who provides technical support for you and the CMS? 

Google has limited technical support for the Google Apps.  A first line of defense would be the county technology department.

 
17.   Please include any additional information about your experience with the CMS.

The big obstacle that I have encountered in my current CMS is in the editing features.  It is not very systematic and as user-friendly as other websites that I have used in the past.

 *Permission granted to use interviewee and library name.

 Reflection: 

I have had a similar experience with Google Apps for Education as a CMS  (my school is in the same system as the librarian interviewed).  The county changed vendors this year so we all are still learning about the features and how to utilize the collaborative components.  In theory, the library CMS should be an information hub and a communication tool supporting the library’s mission of promoting reading and serving patrons so that they can be effective users of information.  Thank goodness Google does provide a wealth of information on training and tips.  Now, it is a matter of applying the training to become more proficient with the content management system.
-Renee

Sunday, May 19, 2013

I surrender Joomla!


Joomla for Dummies. That’s what it felt like.  I have limited experience with web design or content management systems.  After experiencing problems with the initial registration for the demo product (it took several requests and emails) I was ready to begin.  I started with an idea of creating a site for somewhere I’d rather be – my favorite beach area – instead of at home doing homework.  The assignment of two menus and two articles did not seem to be a daunting task.

I watched the ten or eleven video tutorials from cloudaccess, with the first three confusing me.  Why have a product that in the first few steps you are required to delete all of the content in a multistep process (articles, category, & menus).  Why not start with a clean slate.  I am still not sure about the reasoning for filling with sample data only to repopulate with your information.  I did wind up having to return to the tutorials and pause them while I caught up with my project.  It was informative having manageable tutorials in 2-6 minute lengths.  I did follow instructions and download a free template and the JCE Editor – only to simplify my efforts and not really use either.  I found the product to be frustrating and unwieldy.  Not as intuitive as the two other programs I have worked with (School Center & Google Sites).  After spending no less than 9 hours on the assignment, I did also go to Drupal to try it out.  Within twenty minutes of installing Drupal I was making progress and had a basic site started.

So, I wave a white flag and surrender to Joomla.  Here is my first attempt… http://rreedvsu.cloudaccess.net/       I had envisioned much more and I am embarrassed that it is so simple yet took an entire day.  I am drawn to white space and clean lines, which the site does provide.  At this point though I must set it free and move on.  Libraries do need an online presence with features that support their mission and community needs.  As McLean and Burridge (2010) share, using an open source CMS is a logical choice for libraries.  They also tackled their redevelopment in the right way with a team, needs assessment, and identified features.  They report that the experience with Drupal was a success – staff and patrons are happy with the layout, staff members are also pleased with the ease of use and the library has a more interactive presence.
-Renee  

 

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Thank you, Technology

for allowing me to complete my inventory!  Days of scanning barcodes.  How on earth did librarians complete this task before technology?  I cannot even imagine the pain.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Assignment 1 Part III - Finding a Wiki for a Library


The Gilmer County Public Library is in need of a wiki to support their Summer Reading Program.  The primary goals are: (1) to introduce the teen readers to the technology, (2) to allow teen readers to generate discussions and book talks, (3) increase participation in the teen population for the summer reading program, and (3) to promote reading.  There is no allotted budget for the wiki implementation.  The branch manager and children’s librarian are responsible for the summer reading program and wiki implementation.  The program begins in three weeks and runs the duration of the summer.  If the wiki is well received, there is a possibility to continue to website for other teen related reading promotion.

The criteria for selection:  hosted by a company (“wiki farm”), WYSIWYG, page history, own domain allowing for corporate branding.  The facility is also interested in the ability of RSS feeds (Farkas, 2007, p. 80-84).  Other considerations include ease of installation and use, security and permissioning due to the targeted audience, budget, and the ability to customize the look to work with existing library webpage.

The WikiMatrix narrowed the candidate list to fifteen wikis.  A comparison of the wikis revealed the top two contenders to be Wikispaces and Zoho Wiki.  Wikispaces does provide statistical reports that would be helpful in determining the success of the project, however;  Zoho Wiki offers an ad-free service, which is more important for the public library.  Zoho Wiki will be used in conjunction with the library Facebook and new Twitter accounts.

 

Farkas, M. G.  (2007).  Social software in libraries:  Building collaboration, communication, and community online.  Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.